Kontakt
Kako kupovati
Dostava
Savjetnik za kupnju
Principled Judicial Restraint: A Case Against Activism
Engleski
325 b
Do 30 dana za povrat
Kupci su kupili i
/
Meki uvez
19.29
€
/
Meki uvez
27.27
€
/
Meki uvez
20.50
€
Many Americans believe that judicial activism is standard procedure on the modern Supreme Court. Political scientist Jerold Waltman asserts that justices routinely call for restraint when they disagree with specific majority decisions, but they then blithely abandon that position when it suits their purposes. Such calls for restraint are therefore unprincipled. In response, many people have argued that the Court should adopt a more restrained posture across the board, usually appealing to one of two ideas: the inherently undemocratic character of the Supreme Court or the likelihood that the Court is damaging its legitimacy by wading into so many controversial political issues. This book contends that what is sorely needed is a revised-actually a resurrected-constitutional theory that will delegitimize activism, or at least most of it, whether of the liberal or conservative variety.
Informacije o knjizi
Engleski
Poklonite ovu knjigu još danas
To je jednostavno
1 Dodajte knjigu u košaricu i odaberite isporuku kao poklon 2 Zauzvrat ćemo vam poslati kupon 3 Knjiga dolazi na adresu poklonoprimcaMoglo bi vas zanimati i
/
Tvrdi uvez
13.83
€
